Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited develops, manufactures, markets, and distributes pharmaceutical products worldwide. This dividend achiever has paid dividends since 1984, and has increased them for 13 years in a row.
The company’s last dividend increase was in February 2013 when the Board of Directors approved a 25% increase in the quarterly distribution to 1 NIS /share. The company’s peer group includes Actavis (ACT), Taro Pharmaceutical (TARO) and Revlon (REV).
Over the past decade this dividend growth stock has delivered an annualized total return of 8.10% to its shareholders.
The company has managed to deliver a 7.30% average increase in annual EPS since 2003. Analysts expect Teva Pharmaceutical to earn $5.07 per share in 2013 and $5.54 per share in 2014. In comparison, the company earned $2.25/share in 2012. Over the next five years, analysts expect EPS to rise by 6.81%/annum.
The return on equity for Teva has been on the decline from a high of 27% in 2003. Currently, it is below 10%, but if earnings projections materialize, it could go up to 15%. I generally want to see at least a stable return on equity over time. I use this indicator to assess whether management is able to put extra capital to work at sufficient returns.
The annual dividend payment in US dollars has increased by 27.60% per year over the past decade, which is higher than the growth in EPS.
A 27% growth in distributions translates into the dividend payment doubling almost every two and a half years on average. If we look at historical data, going as far back as 1990, one would notice that the company has managed to double distributions every three years on average.
The dividend payout ratio has increased from 12% in 2003 to 46% in 2012. A lower payout is always a plus, since it leaves room for consistent dividend growth minimizing the impact of short-term fluctuations in earnings.
Currently Teva is attractively valued at 16.90 times earnings, yields 2.80% and has a sustainable distribution. Unfortunately, I am not certain if it has the durable competitive advantages that would help it differentiate itself from competitors. It looks like in the generic drugs industry, companies do not have any competitive advantages related to branding, that would allow them to charge premium prices. In the long-run, commodity producers cannot realize excessive profits, that would translate into fat future dividends. As a result, I do not plan on initiating a position in the stock.
Full Disclosure: None
Relevant Articles:
- Dividend Achievers Offer Income Growth and Capital Appreciation
- BHP Billiton (BBL) Dividend Stock Analysis
-\Dividend Stocks for Young Investors
- The World’s Best Dividend Portfolio
- Most Widely Held Dividend Growth Stocks
This article was written by Dividend Growth Investor. If you enjoyed this article, please subscribe to my feed [RSS], or have future articles emailed to you [Email] or follow me on Twitter [Twitter].
